In 2020, during the depths of the pandemic, new parents Paul* and Elizabeth, were sheltering in place with their newborn when they decided to take a chance with their investments . Energy stocks had taken a severe hit and Paul recognized the situation as a “black swan” event. He opened a tax-free savings account (TFSA), did his research, identified historically profitable, dividend paying Canadian energy companies, and went all in.
Today, the couple’s TFSAs are worth $3.5 million and generate $12,000 in dividends each month. Paul, 48, and Elizabeth, 44, are looking to retire — the sooner, the better. If possible, they would like to retire when they each turn 55 , or even 50, just two years from now for Paul.
Paul and Elizabeth have a combined, equally split, pre-tax annual income of $160,000, are debt-free, pay off their credit cards each month, and, because of Ontario’s prohibitive real estate market, have chosen to rent rather than own. While they have about $120,000 in two first home savings accounts they have no plans to purchase a home, though this may change in the future. Their current monthly expenses are about $15,000 including rent of $2,900. They would like to generate about $20,000 in after-tax income in retirement.
In addition to their TFSAs, Elizabeth has about $290,000 in two registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs). She has $250,000 in a self-directed RRSP fully invested in Canadian equities and $40,000 in an employer-supported RRSP fully invested in U.S. equities with a predicted valuation at age 65 of $300,000 or $18,000 a year, assuming she and her employer continue contributions for the next 20 years.
Paul has a defined benefit employer pension indexed to inflation with a commuted value of $250,000. If he retires at age 50, he will receive a reduced pension of $14,000 a year. At age 58, he will receive $40,000 a year, and if he retires at age 64, he will receive $48,000 per year.
“Would lower pensions be a net benefit to us?” asked Paul. “This would mean paying no tax, as our annual incomes would be below the individual amount for deductions.”
Paul and Elizabeth would also like to know how to structure Elizabeth’s RRSP withdrawals in the most tax efficient way and when they should each start taking Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) benefits.
The couple have a self-directed registered education savings plan (RESP) for their son, which is currently valued at $70,000. It is also invested in Canadian energy stocks. “We maximize contributions each year and hope to grow it to at least $150,000 within 10 years. Is this a realistic goal and timeline?” asked Paul.
As the couple prepare to retire, they are looking to diversify their portfolio beyond Canada’s energy sector.
“What is the right mix of investments to be able to generate about $20,000 per month. Is that even feasible?”
What the expert says
Shifting focus from growth to diversification and preservation of assets as they start drawing down their investments will be a big mindset change for Paul and Elizabeth, said Eliott Einarson, a retirement planner at Ottawa-based Exponent Investment Management.
“An independent certified financial planner or portfolio manager can create a comprehensive long-term retirement income plan that will give them a clear view of their finances over the next 50 years. The plan will include how small changes in key assumptions, such as investment returns, inflation, and future income needs, can have major lifetime impacts,” he said.
“For example, if Paul and Elizabeth both retire when Paul turns 50, or even if Paul alone retires in two years and they use all their assets to generate $20,000 a month in after-tax, fully indexed income to age 95 leaving nothing for the estate, their investments need to achieve an average annual return of 7.22 per cent. If their assets only generate an average annual return of 6 per cent, they could be depleted by age 80. However, if they both retire when Paul turns 55, a rate of return of 6 per cent will meet their needs throughout retirement.”
Einarson said another option to retire at 50 is to plan for a 30 per cent reduction in annual income from age 70 to 95, which would be $14,000 net of tax in today’s dollars.
In terms of repositioning their portfolio to reduce risk, Einarson recommended a balanced mix of liquidity, income, and long-term growth. This could include cash to meet immediate short-term needs, a three- to five-year bond ladder to provide income and meet future cash flow needs as the bonds mature, and 70 to 80 per cent of the portfolio invested in dividend-paying equities diversified by sector and geographies for income and long-term growth. If this is too conservative an approach for the couple, Einarson said that a 100 per cent well-diversified equity portfolio could also see them through retirement.
“Diversification, including diversification outside Canada, is essential. Using a portfolio manager, who can provide fiduciary oversight and build a transparent portfolio tailored to their goals and risk tolerance, to buy shares over time in up to 40 individual companies and possibly individual bonds will help create a more balanced portfolio, similar to how pension funds manage their investments.”
Given their current spending and with some planning, Einarson said Paul and Elizabeth could compromise and each work part time from age 50 until age 55. “This would allow them to create a gradual transition into retirement, adjust their portfolio and get comfortable spending from their assets.”
While he believes the couple’s goal to grow the RESP to $150,000 is realistic, Einarson said there is the risk that their focus on Canadian energy stocks could underperform when the funds are needed and recommended they diversify.
Because most of their assets and future income are in TFSAs, Einarson said their overall tax burden should remain low.
“They could convert Paul’s pension at retirement for added flexibility and start drawing from registered accounts in lower tax brackets before starting CPP and OAS at age 70. Deferring, will allow them to maximize the guaranteed, inflation-indexed income and provide them a 15-year window to strategically draw down the RRSP mostly tax-free.”
Einarson said a retirement plan will help them weigh the pros and cons of taking government benefits early versus deferring them.
“The key is to complete the plan before making the transition.”
*Names have been changed to protect privacy.
Are you worried about having enough for retirement? Do you need to adjust your portfolio? Are you starting out or making a change and wondering how to build wealth? Are you trying to make ends meet? Drop us a line at wealth@postmedia.com with your contact info and the gist of your problem and we’ll find some experts to help you out while writing a Family Finance story about it (we’ll keep your name out of it, of course).
