Since my last article has something to do with fixed income and high yield bonds was a feature, I decide to take a quick glance how high yield have been doing.
FSMOne, under iFast has the widest range of unit trust that you can look up.
You can use their Fund Selector to help you filter to the unit trust you are interested in.
Here are my filters:
- Asset Class: Fixed Income
- Geographical Sector: Global
- Specialist Sector: High Yield
- Currency: USD
- Toggle: View in Product Currency (from View in SGD)
We have about 9 Global high yield unit trusts.
I want to contrast them to the iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF, which is an Irish-domiciled ETF listed on the London Stock Exchange that you can purchase through Interactive Brokers. The ETF tracks the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index.
There are a few share class of note:
There are more classes such as USD, EUR and GBP hedged that might interest some of you.
I listed the fund name and the benchmark index, and the 5-year and 10-year annualized performances against the HYLD:
| Product Name | Benchmark Index | 5 YR (USD) Annualized | 10 YR (USD) Annualized |
| AB FCP I Global High Yield AT USD | Bloomberg Global High Yield Index (USD hedged) | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| Aviva Investors – Global High Yield Bond A USD | BBg Gbl HY ex CMBS & EMG 2% C TR HUSD | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Blackrock Global High Yield Bond A2 USD | ICE BofA Global High Yield Constrained (HW0C) 100% USD Hedged Index | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| Fidelity Global High Yield A-ACC-USD | ICE BofA Q788 Custom Index Hedged to USD | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| GS Global High Yield Portfolio MDist USD | Bloomberg U.S. High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index | 0.5% | 3.0% |
| HGIF – US Short Duration High Yield Bond AC USD | 3.7% | 3.9% | |
| JPMorgan Investment Funds – Global High Yield Bond A (acc) USD | ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index (Total Return Gross) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
| Janus Henderson Horizon Global High Yield Bond A4M USD | ICE BofA Global High Yield Constrained USD Hdg | 1.9% | |
| PIMCO Global High Yield Bond Fund Cl E Acc USD | ICE BofA BB-B Rated Developed Markets High Yield Constrained Index | 3.3% | 4.5% |
| iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF | Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index | 4.4% | 4.6% |
Some of these funds are accumulating (does not pay out a distribution) and distributing, but officially the return on factsheets are total returns, which are returns that consider capital gains and distributions.
The problem with funds is that you have no idea what a manager was trying to do, and looking at their listed benchmark, may give you some clues because that is what you are trying to beat. One fund HSBC’s US Short Duration High Yield bond doesn’t have a benchmark.
The weird thing is that JPMorgan’s Global High Yield Bond uses a US high yield index. What is up with that. If you check it’s factsheet, you would realize that its like 94.4% in US.
5-years and 10-years is not always long time frames in my opinion and more considered intermediate timeframes but they easily give me some data for how the actively-managed unit trust perform. And almost all underperform the iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF.
The one that outperform was… the JPMorgan’s Global High Yield Bond fund. Not sure if it is their direction taken to be so much in US, but we can always compare the performance against iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU) to see how a more US high yield focus fund does against a US index ETF. SHYU did 5.0% for 5-years and 5% for 10-years.
In a way JPMorgan kept pace with the index, despite higher fee.
BlackRock’s Global High Yield did as well as the index over a 10-year timeframe.
If you are wondering if there is an upside in owning actively managed high yield fixed income for better performance, or greater peace of mind, the answer seems to be… not so much.
There isn’t an upside there despite a lot of talk about able to time based on economic regimes.
At least not these group of managers.
Even they do well, they kept pace.
One thing you would also notice is… likely that 5-year and 10-year return is lower than the yield-to-maturity of the high yield fixed income.
Why is that?
Yield that they earn is part of the equation. You would give back through fees, manager’s decision but also when the amount of fixed income default.
In the table below, I put out some metrics that allow us to understand each of their current portfolios better:
| Product Name | Yield to Worst | Maturity (Yrs) | Duration (Yrs) | Average Credit Quality | % of CCC and Below | Total Holdings |
| AB FCP I Global High Yield AT USD | 7.06% | 3.4 | BB | 9.5% | 2192 | |
| Aviva Investors – Global High Yield Bond A USD | 7.32% | 9.9 | 3.4 | BB | 9.8% | |
| Blackrock Global High Yield Bond A2 USD | 6.95% | 4.0 | 3.0 | B to BB | 14.7% | 1075 |
| Fidelity Global High Yield A-ACC-USD | 7.95% | 2.9 | BB- | 9.8% | ||
| GS Global High Yield Portfolio MDist USD | 6.76% | 2.8 | BB | 17.1% | 576 | |
| HGIF – US Short Duration High Yield Bond AC USD | 5.00% | 2.0 | 1.8 | BB-/B+ | 3.9% | 222 |
| JPMorgan Investment Funds – Global High Yield Bond A (acc) USD | 3.8 | 2.5 | ||||
| Janus Henderson Horizon Global High Yield Bond A4M USD | 6.55% | 3.7 | 3.0 | B | 8.1% | 185 |
| PIMCO Global High Yield Bond Fund Cl E Acc USD | 6.83% | 4.9 | 2.8 | BAA- | ||
| iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 5.85% | 3.5 | 3.0 | BB | 6.7% | 1984 |
Most of the average yield-to-maturity is higher than the iShares ETF, and their credit quality tends to be worse. This shows that the fund managers are reaching for lower quality to boost the return. I have also listed out the amount of fixed income they own that is of CCC credit quality and below because those are where the high default rates are when shit hits the fan.
Almost all have more CCC rated and below bonds with BlackRock and Goldman Sachs high yield have the highest allocation.
Duration, measures the sensitivity of fixed income securities to changes in interest rate. Generally, you will realize that high yield have much shorter duration which means they are less sensitive to interest rate rise. They are more sensitive to economic recession.
So do bear in mind the characteristics are different.
Duration is affected by how significant the coupon and how long is the maturity. If a fixed income has longer maturity, duration is higher. If coupon is larger, duration is shorter.
Since high yield’s coupons are generally more significant, the duration tend to be lower.
If you want to trade these stocks I mentioned, you can open an account with Interactive Brokers. Interactive Brokers is the leading low-cost and efficient broker I use and trust to invest & trade my holdings in Singapore, the United States, London Stock Exchange and Hong Kong Stock Exchange. They allow you to trade stocks, ETFs, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account.
You can read more about my thoughts about Interactive Brokers in this Interactive Brokers Deep Dive Series, starting with how to create & fund your Interactive Brokers account easily.
