Better not pick a fight with ‘nasty’ Canadians — Richard Mills

July 25, 2025 (Investorideas.com Newswire) — In 1914, a
Christmas Truce oddly broke out between the Allied and Entente
soldiers, thousands of whom leapt from their trenches to trade gifts
and play soccer in no-man’s land.

The following year, it
was the Canadians Corps’ first Christmas on the Western Front. In a
trench near Ypres, the enemy was inviting them over for a party.

“Merry Christmas, Canadians,” said the opposing Germans, poking
their heads above the parapet and waving a box of cigars. A
Canadian sergeant responded by opening fire, hitting two of the
merrymakers.

“When they returned it, one of our lads was shot through the
head. That put an end to our Christmas gathering quickly,” Lance
Cpl. George D’All wrote in a letter home.

It was a preview of coming developments. Canadian soldiers would
emerge from the First World War with a reputation for winning
victories that others could not. But even in a war of unparalleled
ferocity, enemy and ally alike would remember the Canadians as
having been particularly brutal.

‘The forgotten ruthlessness of Canada’s Great War soldiers’,
National Post, Nov. 12, 2018

Canadians as brutal? There must be some mistake. More than a century
after the end of World War I, Canadians would be surprised to learn
that soldiers representing the country abroad could be so vicious in
war.

After all, modern Canadians are peace-loving. Affable. Respectful.
Nice. One can imagine a 21^st century Canadian soldier
apologizing to his enemy before firing a round and killing him. A
lot of Canadians see Canada’s primary military responsibility as
peacekeeping, not warfighting. In fact, Canadians have fought in
every major war or conflict that Britain found itself in, and we
sent soldiers to Afghanistan to back the United States-led
multilateral mission there following 9/11.

Canadians fought in the Boer War on the side of Britain. Canadians
fought and died in the trenches during World War I. Most of the
primary sources cited from the National Post article cited above
came from books or journal articles written by Tim Cook, a Canadian
War Museum historian who was good at painting an unromanticized
picture of Canada’s First World War army.

Canadian soldiers were some of the best street fighters during World
War II. In the Korean War, Canada fought alongside the United
Nations to defend South Korea against the invasion by North
Korea.

While not organized soldiers, the activities of the Coeur de Bois
Frenchmen who explored the interior of North America and established
trade networks with indigenous peoples were closely intertwined
with French military efforts in New France.

The reason I bring all this up? President Trump has recently said
Canadians are “nasty” to deal with because of US boycotts. The
remark was made a few days ago by Peter Hoekstra, the US ambassador
to Canada, about Canadians avoiding US travel and alcohol, while
speaking at a regional summit in Bellevue, Washington.

British Columbia Premier David Eby had some choice words in response
to Hoekstra’s comments. In an interview Monday on CBC’s ‘Power &
Politics’, Eby said he believes US leadership has “very little
awareness” of how offensive their remarks are.

“Do they think Canadians are not going to respond when the president
says, ‘I want to turn you into the 51st state and beggar you
economically unless you bow to the U.S.’?” Eby fumed. “Obviously,
Canadians are outraged.”

The premier said Tuesday that Canadians would be proud to be
considered mean and nasty for standing up for their sovereignty and
economy in the face of threats from the Trump administration. (BIV)

In a statement, Eby said that Hoekstra’s remarks show Canadians’
efforts to stand up to Trump are “having an impact,” and he
encouraged people to “keep it up.” (CBC News)

100%. In fact we should thank Trump for waking us up to the fact
that we are a proud country, not some 51^st state, that
can stand on its own without any help from the United States, and
that we are stronger united, not to mention with a shared hostility
towards the current US administration, that has been treating its
most established, trusted ally like shit.

Canada at war

Early history

The military history of Canada spans centuries of
conflicts within the country, as well as international engagements
involving the Canadian military. The indigenous nations of Canada
engaged in conflicts with one another for millennia. The arrival of
European settlers in the 17th century led to new alliances and
hostilities among indigenous nations and colonial power, leading to
conflicts such as the Beaver Wars.

The late 17th and 18th centuries saw four major British French
conflicts fought in Canada, culminating with the British
conquest of New France 1760. This reshaped the region and
contributed to the American Revolutionary War, during which American
attempts to seize Quebec and spark a revolt in Nova Scotia failed.
(Wikipedia)

Key wars and conflicts Canada was involved in: (AI Overview)

War of 1812: Fought against the United States, with Canada
defending its territory.

Fenian Raids: Series of attacks on British North America by
Irish American nationalists.

North-West Rebellion: Conflict with Métis and First Nations
peoples in Western Canada.

South African War (Boer War): Canada’s first official
dispatch of troops to an overseas war.

World War I: Canada played a significant role on the Western
Front, including battles at Ypres, Vimy Ridge, and
Passchendaele.

World War II: Canada contributed significantly to the Allied
war effort, participating in battles in Europe, Asia and the
Atlantic.

Korean War: Canada sent troops as part of the United Nations
force fighting against North Korea.

War in Afghanistan: Canada’s longest war since World War II,
involving a significant military presence and combat
operations.

Other notable conflicts:

Seven Years’ War: Canada played a role in the British
conquest of New France.

American Revolutionary War: Canada defended its territory
against the American colonies.

Gulf War: Canada participated in the international coalition
against Iraq.

The Black Watch

The Black Watch was a feared and famous Canadian regiment. The
Primary Reserve infantry regiment of the Canadian army was formed in
Montreal, Quebec, in 1862. The Black Watch was initially tasked with
border security in response to the rise of American military
strength. The regiment has a long history of military service. Among
the conflicts and operations, it has participated in are the Boer
War, World War I and II including the Dieppe Raid, the Korean War,
NATO operations in Europe and UN peacekeeping missions.

Officers from the 1st Battalion, The Black Watch (Royal
Highland Regiment) of Canada taken two months before the battle
for Verrieres Ridge. All but eight of these men became
casualties in Normandy. Source: Black Watch Archives.

Boer War

In the Boer War, over 7,000 Canadians volunteered to fight
alongside British forces against the Boer republics in South
Africa. Canadian troops participated in major battles like
Paardeberg and Leliefontein and also engaged in smaller actions
during the guerrilla warfare phase. While some Canadians served
in British units, many fought in specifically raised Canadian
contingents, including the Royal Canadian Regiment and Strathcona’s
Horse. The war was significant as it marked the first time
Canadian troops fought overseas in a conflict, and they gained
recognition for their bravery and fighting ability. (AI Overview)

Canada sent three contingents to South Africa. Of the +7,000
Canadians who served in the war, including 12 nurses, approximately
270 died. (The Canadian Encyclopedia)

Canadian soldiers — *Source: The Canadian Encyclopedia*

The War of 1812

During the War of 1812, Canada, then British North America, played a
crucial role in defending against American invasion
attempts. The conflict, which lasted from 1812 to 1815, saw
Canadians from various backgrounds, including British regulars,
Canadian militia, First Nations warriors, and Métis fighters, unite
to protect their territory. Their combined efforts, along with
support from the British Royal Navy and Army, successfully repelled
repeated American offensives. This defense contributed
significantly to the development of a distinct Canadian identity and
solidified the foundations of a future independent nation.

Key battles and victories:

Canadians played significant roles in battles like the Battle of
Queenston Heights, where Major-General Isaac Brock, allied with
indigenous warriors, died defending the territory. Other
notable engagements include the Battle of the Thames (where
Tecumseh, a Shawnee leader, died fighting for the British), the
Battle of Lundy’s Lane, and the defense of Montreal. (AI Overview)

World War I

Canada was involved in World War I primarily through its land
forces, the Canadian Expeditionary Force (CEF), which fought on the
Western Front. The CEF grew to become the Canadian Corps, a
powerful formation of four divisions with 100,000
troops. Beyond the Western Front, Canada also made substantial
contributions to the war effort through its economy, providing food,
munitions, and financial support to the Allies. (AI Overview)

Back to the brutality of the Canadian army in the First World War,
as
described by The National Post:

British war correspondent Philip Gibbs had a front row seat on
four years of Western Front fighting. He would single out the
Canadians as having been particularly obsessed with killing
Germans, calling their war a kind of vendetta. “The Canadians
fought the Germans with a long, enduring, terrible, skilful
patience,” he wrote after the war.

The English poet Robert Graves was less charitable. In his 1929
bestseller ‘Good-Bye to All That’, he wrote “the troops that had
the worst reputation for acts of violence against prisoners were
the Canadians.”

Germans developed a special contempt for the Canadian Corps,
seeing them as unpredictable savages. In the final weeks of the
war, Canadian Fred Hamilton would describe being singled out for a
beating by a German colonel after he was taken prisoner. “I don’t
care for the English, Scotch, French, Australians or Belgians but
damn you Canadians, you take no prisoners, and you kill our
wounded,” the colonel told him

Throughout the war, stretches of the Western Front observed an
unofficial “live and let live” policy between Germans and their
French or British enemies. By mutual agreement, both sides agreed
not to attack the other unless ordered and would even schedule
truces for meals and bathroom breaks.

There are very few recorded instances of this ever happening with
Canadians. As Canadian Corps commander Arthur Currie would often
boast after the war, his troops prided themselves on killing the
enemy wherever and whenever they could.

“We tried to make his life miserable,” Currie said in 1919.

In one particularly cruel episode, Canadians even exploited the
trust of Germans who had apparently become accustomed to
fraternizing with allied units. Lieutenant Louis Keene described
the practice of lobbing tins of corned beef into a neighbouring
German trench. When the Canadians started hearing happy shouts of
“More! Give us more!” they then let loose with an armload of grenades.

For those Germans unlucky enough to face a trench full of
Canadians, one of their greatest fears was nighttime raids on
unsuspecting enemy trenches

At the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa, visitors can see a case
filled with the fearsome homemade weapons that Canadians trench
raiders plunged into the faces and chests of their enemy: Meat
cleavers, push daggers and spiked clubs.

While all Commonwealth units were encouraged to conduct trench
raids, Canadians were widely regarded as trench raiding’s most
enthusiastic practitioners and innovators.

They wore thick rubber gloves and blackened their faces for
maximum stealth. They crafted homemade pipe bombs and grenade
catapults to increase their killing power. They continued raiding
even while other colonial units abandoned the practice

As their skills grew, Canadian trench raiders were eventually
able to penetrate up to one kilometre behind enemy lines, dealing
surprise death to Germans who had every reason to believe they
were safe from enemy bayonets. In the days before the attack on
Vimy Ridge, trench raids of up to 900 men were hurled at enemy
lines on a nightly basis. These were essentially mini battles,
except instead of holding ground attackers were merely expected to
sow death, chaos and then disappear.

More than 42,000 Germans would survive their encounter with the
Canadian Corps and live out the Great War as prisoners. But as
soldiers’ accounts began to trickle behind the lines, it became
clear that untold numbers of Germans attempt to surrender to
Canadians were being met only with bayonets or bullets

Others were cold-blooded executions. In one case, a Canadian
surreptitiously slipped a live grenade into the greatcoat pockets
of a German prisoner. In another, infantryman Richard Rogerson
went on a killing spree at Vimy Ridge after seeing the death of
his friend. “Once I killed my first German with my bayonit my
blood was riled, every german I could not reach with my bayonit I
shot. I think no more of murdering them than I usted to think of
shooting rabbits,” he wrote.

In some cases, Cook found evidence of Canadian commanders
explicitly ordering their troops not to take prisoners. He quoted
James Owen, a then-16-year-old private, who was told by his
commanding officer before a 1916 attack “I don’t want any
prisoners.” Before the attack on Vimy Ridge, veteran Archie McWade
said he was told, “Remember, no prisoners. They will just eat your
rations”

What confused both friend and foe alike was why Canadians were so
vicious

One theory was that Canadians were perpetually avenging the
“Crucified Canadian,” a battlefield rumour of a captured Canadian
officer that Germans had supposedly crucified to a barn door near
Ypres. The crucifixion was almost certainly fabricated.

Another was that Canadians had never forgiven the Germans’ first
use of poison gas in 1915, of which Canadian units had been some
of the hardest hit. The Canadian Corps would eventually become the
most enthusiastic user of poison gas on the Western Front. “We
like to think of Canada as pure, but Canadians gassed everything
that moved whenever they could,” said historian Jack Granatstein
in a recent about the last months of the First World War. As
Currie himself would say after the war “if we could have killed
the whole German Army by gas, we would gladly have done so.”

World War II

Canada played a significant military role in World War
II, contributing troops to key battles and significantly
bolstering Allied war production. The Canadian military,
particularly the army, navy, and air force, participated in major
campaigns in Europe, including Sicily, Italy, and Normandy, and
played a crucial role in the liberation of Western
Europe. Beyond combat, Canada also became a vital source of war
materials, supplying vast quantities of arms, vehicles, and other
supplies to Allied forces.

Military operations:

Italy Campaign: Canadian troops fought their way north
through Italy from 1943 to early 1945, enduring fierce battles and
contributing to the eventual Allied victory.

D-Day and Normandy: Canadian forces landed on Juno Beach on
D-Day, 6 June 1944, and played a crucial role in the liberation of
Western Europe.

Liberation of Belgium: Canadian troops helped liberate
Belgium in the fall of 1944, further pushing back German
forces.

Battle of the Scheldt: Canadian forces were also involved in
the crucial Battle of the Scheldt, clearing the way for Allied
shipping to reach the port of Antwerp.

Naval and Air Force contributions:

Navy: The Royal Canadian Navy grew to be the third-largest
navy in the world during the war, playing a vital role in
protecting convoys and engaging enemy ships.

Air Force: The Royal Canadian Air Force participated in major
air campaigns, including bombing raids and fighter combat,
contributing to Allied air supremacy. (AI Overview)

A document housed in the AHS Library, from G1 Roundtable47, Our
Oldest Good Neighbor (1946), is titled ‘What Was Canada’s Role in World War II‘. It makes the following points from the US perspective:

Canada, of its own free will, entered the war in September 1939
because it then realized that Nazi Germany threatened the very
existence of Western civilization.

Almost from the beginning Canadians were in the thick of the
fighting in the air. In that element the Dominion made its most
striking contribution to the general war effort. On the outbreak
of hostilities, the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan was
established in Canada to develop the air forces of Britain,
Australia, and New Zealand, as well as of Canada. It was under the
direction of the Royal Canadian Air Force, and it cost the
Canadian government well over 1.5 billion dollars.

Here it may be well to note that Canada’s population is only about
one-eleventh that of our country. We have to multiply Canadian
figures by eleven, therefore, to get the approximate American
equivalent of Canada’s war effort.

By 1944, the Royal Canadian Air Force had a strength of more than
200,000. This was only a part of what Canada did in this line, for
at the same time nearly half the ground crew personnel and more
than a quarter of the air crew strength of the Royal Air Force
were also Canadians.

The Royal Canadian Navy, which started from scratch in 1939, grew
to 700 ships and 95,000 men. This force too was in the fight from
almost the beginning. It participated in the daring rescue at
Dunkirk, and it took over more and more of the Allied convoy work
across the north Atlantic half of it by 1943 and most of it by
the end of 1944.

The Canadian army numbered in 1944 about half a million men,
five-sixths of whom had volunteered for overseas service. Some of
it formed most of the force that suffered disaster at Dieppe in
the summer of 1942. Some fought alongside Americans and British in
Sicily and Italy. But the main military effort of the Canadians
began in June 1944 with the landing on the beaches of Normandy and
continued with the fight across France and into Germany.

Canadian units were out in Hong Kong when the Japanese attacked it
on Pearl Harbor Day, and the Canadian declaration of war against
Japan was made the evening before our declaration. A battalion of
Canadian troops took part in the landing on Kiska in the Aleutian
Islands.

Canada’s place in the world is much bigger than it ever was
before. Though not a great power, Canada is no longer a small one.
It is one of the middle powersperhaps the strongest of themand
as such is bound to play an important part in the affairs of the
world.

The Korean War

Canada played a significant role in the Korean War as part of
the United Nations (UN) forces, contributing personnel to the army,
navy, and air force. Over 26,000 Canadians served in Korea
between 1950 and 1953, with 516 losing their lives in the
conflict. Canada’s involvement stemmed from its commitment to
the UN and its support for collective security and the United States
during the Cold War.

Canadian soldiers, particularly the Princess Patricia’s Canadian
Light Infantry and the Royal Canadian Regiment, were involved in key
battles like the Battle of Kapyong and the defense of Hill
355. (AI Overview)

NORAD

Pride in Canadian military accomplishments was imbued in the
population in the decades after the Korean War. Fear of a Soviet
long-range bomber attack or nuclear strike was behind the creation
of NORAD in 1958.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command is responsible for the
shared monitoring and defence of North American aerospace.

According to a Canadian government backgrounder, “Over the years,
the strength of NORAD has rested in its ability to evolve in
response to the changing threat environment. For example, in 1985,
Canada and the US agreed to modernize NORAD by replacing the Distant
Early Warning (DEW) line with the North Warning System (NWS). In the
aftermath of 9/11, NORAD implemented Operation NOBLE EAGLE to
address air security threats. By 2006, our countries had renewed
the NORAD Agreement in perpetuity and added maritime
warning to the overall mission.”

Public perception

When the Canadian government sent troops to Afghanistan, public
perception was mixed. While some Canadians, especially veterans and
those involved in aid and development, believed the mission was
worthwhile, others questioned its effectiveness, given the
resurgence of the Taliban and the ongoing conflict.

Support for the military as measured by defense spending as a
percentage of GDP has fluctuated, but over the past decade it has
failed to meet the 2% target expected by NATO.

This is a major bone of contention with the current Trump
administration, which views Canada and other nations not meeting the
2% threshold as defense laggards riding on the coattails of the US.

(Prime Minister Carney has said Canada will meet the 2% target by
March of this year. $9.3B in new spending includes military
recruitment and pay increases for personnel. (CBC News))

However, a
recent poll
suggests that Canadians’ support for the military is on the rise.

Abacus Data found a combined 67% of Canadians now have a very or
mostly positive impression of the Canadian Armed Forces, an increase
of 7 points since March. Notably, the share of those with a very
positive impression rose from 21% to 31%, a 10-point gain.

Favorable opinions remain strongest among Canadians aged 60 and
older, as well as those living in the Atlantic region.

Canadian poll on support for armed forces — *Source: Abacus Data*

US tariffs on Canada and vice-versa

Turning from the military to the Canada-US trade war, Canadians’
respect for the United States as both an economic and a military
partner has been shattered since Trump in his second term included
Canada in a global trade war.

On April 2, so-called “Liberation Day”, a 10% tariff on non-CUSMA
(Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement)-compliant potash and energy
products was imposed, along with a 25% tariff on cars and trucks not
built in the US.

This was followed by a 50% tariff on aluminum and steel imports from
all countries including Canada, effective June 4.

Other tariffs that were previously mentioned remain on the table,
such as:

50% tariff on copper as of Aug. 1.

Tariffs on Canadian lumber, which would be in addition to the
existing 14.7% tariffs, as well as on Canadian dairy products.

Semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals are also under consideration
for tariffs, though no details have been provided on the timing or
rates.

The elimination of the duty exemption for low-value shipments
under $800 (de minimis exemption). (CFIB)

One of the biggest concerns of Canadian businesses selling into the
US is the fact that Trump keeps changing the rules, making it
extremely difficult to plan. The latest is his threat to impose a
35% tariff on non-CUSMA Canadian imports starting Aug. 1. Prime
Minister Carney and his team of negotiators are trying to reach a
trade deal with the US before then.

In response to US tariffs, Canada has imposed a 25% tariff on $30
billion worth of US goods, introduced tariffs on an additional $29.8
billion worth of US products in retaliation for US tariffs on
aluminum and steel, and levied a 25% tariff on all US vehicles that
don’t meet CUSMA requirements, in response to similar tariffs
introduced by the US. (CFIB)

Buy Canadian, stay-cation

Canadians have seen food prices skyrocket in the post-covid years
along with many other consumables. With Canadians buying so much
from the US the country is by far our largest trading partner
the threat of inflation looms large on imported American goods.

That, and Trump’s provocative statements about making Canada the
51^st
state, have brought about a “Buy Canadian” movement that eschews the
purchase of US goods and travel state-side.

Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, Quebec and Nova are
among the provinces that have banned the sale of US alcohol
from government-run liquor stores.

According to the Financial Post,

On Monday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford renewed his call to buy “Canadian-made everything” to pressure the United States to negotiate a trade
deal.

“We’re encouraging all provinces and territories: start buying
Canadian-made vehicles, start buying Canadian-made everything
that will hurt more than anything at all,” Ford told reporters at
the premiers’ meeting near Huntsville, Ont.

The FP article references a Bank of Canada consumer survey that
shows Canadians plan to keep up their boycott of US travel and
products.

Half of consumers said they plan to cut their spending on US goods
and vacations. About 60% plan to spend more on goods made in Canada
and one-third plan to spend more on vacations within Canada.

Among the
US products hit by the strong Buy Canadian movement
are diapers and baby wipes, American bourbon and whiskey, and citrus
fruits from California.

Most Canadians said they are willing to pay up to 10% more for goods
made in the country.

New data
quoted by CTV News
shows there were about 26,000 fewer cross-border trips from eastern
Ontario into New York State in June the fifth straight month of
declines.

Poll on Canadian spending — *Source: Bank of Canada*

Removing inter-provincial trade barriers

The Trump tariffs have elicited a push to lessen or remove
inter-provincial trade barriers that have been a trade irritant for
decades. An inability to sell alcohol between provinces is one such
irritant.

At a summit this week in Ontario between the country’s premiers and
the prime minister, the Ford government announced an MOU between
British Columbia and Ontario to collaborate on interprovincial
trade, attempting to reduce duplication, pull down barriers and
harmonize various regulations and standards. (Global News)

Ontario now has 10 new agreements to reduce internal trade barriers
with other provinces and three territories.

“With President Trump’s ongoing threats to our economy, there’s
never been a more important time to boost internal trade to build a
more competitive, resilient and self-reliant economy,” Ford said in
a Monday statement.

“By signing these MOUs and working together, we’re helping Canada
unlock up to $200 billion in economic potential and standing
shoulder to shoulder to protect Canadian workers across the
country.”

The next day, BC signed trade deals with Manitoba and the Yukon. The
deal with Manitoba includes measures to increase the mobility of
regulated workers between the two provinces, as well as allowing
direct alcohol sales from Manitoba to BC consumers. BC alcohol can
already be sold direct to consumers in Manitoba.

The Yukon agreement focuses on the removal of trade barriers as well
as the alignment of standards for regulated occupations. (Global TV
News)

Diversifying trade

Along with streamlining trade between provinces and territories,
there is growing interest to diversify the shipment of goods and
services away from the United States again in the face of Trump’s
tariffs.

Reuters reported
on July 9 that
Canadian government data shows exports to the U.S. dropped by 10
percentage points to 68% of total exports between May 2024 and May
2025, primarily of manufacturing products such as cars and parts,
and products made with steel and aluminum.

The country in May exported more gold, petroleum, uranium and
pharmaceuticals to the United Kingdom and the European Union, and to
Australia and Indonesia compared to a year earlier.

Exports of a variety of commodities to Singapore, Italy, the
Netherlands, Indonesia, Australia, Brazil, Germany and Japan
increased.

Trade data also showed that from March to May, the UK replaced
China as Canada’s second-largest export market. Canola and crude oil
exports to China dropped amid China’s tariffs on Canadian
agricultural imports.

An energy superpower

Prime Minister Carney has vowed to expedite “nation-building
infrastructure projects” including new pipelines and railways to
connect Canada, develop critical mineral mines, and turn the country
into an “energy superpower”.

Towards that goal, the parliament passed Bill C-5, also known as the
“one-economy act,” becoming law on June 26.

The legislation fulfils a campaign promise by Prime Minister Carney
to speed up approvals of projects, including mines and oil
pipelines. Proponents of such projects often face duplicate
environmental permitting processes involving the federal and
provincial governments and affected First Nations.

Carney told the Calgary Herald in June that a new Alberta-to-BC pipeline is likely to be
included among the federal government’s list of projects of national
interest covered by C-5.

A previous pipeline proposal known as Northern Gateway was shelved
amid opposition from environmental groups and local First Nations.
To date, the twinned Trans Mountain route is the only pipeline
shipping Alberta’s landlocked crude for export on tankers from
Vancouver.

According to World Nuclear News,

The First Ministers “welcomed the Prime Minister’s commitment to
ensuring all federal assessment decisions are rendered within two
years, beginning with projects of national interest” and agreed to
work towards implementing ‘one project, one review’ with the goal
of a single assessment for all projects — in a manner that
respects federal, provincial, and territorial jurisdiction —
to “help kickstart economic growth and ensure that projects get
built in a timely manner.” They also pledged to consult with
Indigenous Peoples.

At the current premiers’ meeting in Ontario, Ontario Premier Doug
Ford, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and Alberta Premier Danielle
Smith signed an MOU saying they plan to work together to study a
potential east-west pipeline made with domestically produced steel
to connect to the not-yet-built James Bay deep-sea port in Ontario.

It also means the two provinces will study the feasibility of
building a railway line from the mineral-rich Ring of Fire in
northern Ontario to mineral processing facilities in Western Canada.
(Global News)

Conclusion

This article attempted to knit together two themes: First, to dispel
the notion that Canadians are pacifists who turn the other cheek in
a fight. Far from avoiding a battle, Canadian soldiers have garnered
a fearsome reputation for brutality, seen in WW I through trench
raiding, killing prisoners or mistreating them, exploiting the trust
of Germans, and not adhering to scheduled truces.

Trump’s characterization of Canadians as “nasty” is thus
historically accurate, at least when there’s a fight on.

The second theme is national unity. Trump’s attempt to cow Canadians
through economic intimidation has backfired, bigly. A US travel and
goods boycott means few Canadians are traveling to the States by air
or by car and are preferring local goods over American imports. Of
course, not everyone has the luxury of this choice, as many US
imports beat Canadian goods on price.

The more important effect of the Trump tariffs is arguably the push
to reduce interprovincial trade barriers and to streamline the
process of building infrastructure of national importance. In both
these areas, over-regulation has stunted growth and kept Canada in
the slow lane when it comes to big projects. A city like Vancouver
takes years to build one new subway line, or one new bridge. In
China, 815 kilometers of high-speed rail was completed in less than
five years. The replacement of the Sanyuan Bridge in Beijing was
completed in a record 43 hours, whereas highway construction
machines can lay down 10-15 kilometers of road per day. (AI Overview)

The comparison between authoritarian Beijing and democratic Ottawa
may not be the most fitting, but working together to “build baby
build” is something worth getting behind not only for the economic
gains it would produce but the national pride it would engender. Few
realize it but Trump has given us a golden opportunity. As chaos
reins south of the border we have the chance to establish an orderly
path forward.

Let’s become an energy and a mining superpower that doesn’t involve
railing oil south or shipping concentrates abroad for processing. We
can build more oil refineries in Eastern Canada to process crude
shipped from Alberta. We can build more smelters to refine minerals
produced domestically.

The federal government has the difficult job of juggling federal,
provincial and First Nations interests in reaching its goals, but it
can be done. Canadians have shown they are nasty in war and when
dealing with a tyrant in Washington who has threatened our
livelihoods and our sovereignty. But ownership of natural resources
grants immense power. Let’s use it to exert leverage over our
adversaries and to start new trading relationships with countries
that show us respect.

Richard (Rick) Mills
aheadoftheherd.com

Subscribe to AOTH’s free newsletter

Legal Notice / Disclaimer

Ahead of the Herd newsletter, aheadoftheherd.com, hereafter known as
AOTH.
Please read the
entire Disclaimer carefully before you
use this website or read the newsletter. If you do not agree to all
the AOTH/Richard Mills Disclaimer, do not access/read this
website/newsletter/article, or any of its pages. By reading/using
this AOTH/Richard Mills website/newsletter/article, and whether you
actually read this Disclaimer, you are deemed to have accepted it.

Richard (Rick) Mills
aheadoftheherd.com
subscribe to my free newsletter

Legal Notice / Disclaimer

Ahead of the Herd newsletter,
aheadoftheherd.com, hereafter known as AOTH.

Please read the entire Disclaimer carefully before you use this
website or read the newsletter. If you do not agree to all the
AOTH/Richard Mills Disclaimer, do not access/read this website/newsletter/article, or any of its
pages. By reading/using this AOTH/Richard Mills
website/newsletter/article, and whether you actually read this
Disclaimer, you are deemed to have accepted it.

Any AOTH/Richard Mills document is not, and should not be, construed
as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or
subscribe for any investment.

AOTH/Richard Mills has based this document on information obtained
from sources he believes to be reliable, but which has not been
independently verified.

AOTH/Richard Mills makes no guarantee, representation or warranty
and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or
completeness.

Expressions of opinion are those of AOTH/Richard Mills only and are
subject to change without notice.

AOTH/Richard Mills assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for
the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any
information provided within this Report and will not be held liable
for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement
contained herein or any omission.

Furthermore, AOTH/Richard Mills assumes no liability for any direct
or indirect loss or damage for lost profit, which you may incur as a
result of the use and existence of the information provided within
this AOTH/Richard Mills Report.

You agree that by reading AOTH/Richard Mills articles, you are
acting at your OWN RISK. In no event should AOTH/Richard Mills
liable for any direct or indirect trading losses caused by any
information contained in AOTH/Richard Mills articles. Information in
AOTH/Richard Mills articles is not an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any security. AOTH/Richard Mills is
not suggesting the transacting of any financial instruments.

Our publications are not a recommendation to buy or sell a security
– no information posted on this site is to be considered investment
advice or a recommendation to do anything involving finance or money
aside from performing your own due diligence and consulting with
your personal registered broker/financial advisor. AOTH/Richard
Mills recommends that before investing in any securities, you
consult with a professional financial planner or advisor, and that
you should conduct a complete and independent investigation before
investing in any security after prudent consideration of all
pertinent risks. Ahead of the Herd is not a registered broker,
dealer, analyst, or advisor. We hold no investment licenses and may
not sell, offer to sell, or offer to buy any security.

About Investorideas.com – Big Investing Ideas

Investorideas.com is
the go-to platform for big investing ideas. From breaking stock news
to top-rated investing podcasts, we cover it all. Our original
branded content includes podcasts such as Exploring Mining,
Cleantech, Crypto Corner, Cannabis News, and the AI Eye. We also
create free investor stock directories for sectors including mining,
crypto, renewable energy, gaming, biotech, tech, sports and more.
Public companies within the sectors we cover can use our news
publishing and content creation services to help tell their story to
interested investors. Paid content is always disclosed.

Disclaimer/Disclosure: is the go-to platform for
big investing ideas. From breaking stock news to top-rated investing
podcasts, we cover it all. Disclaimer/Disclosure Our site does not
make recommendations for purchases or sale of stocks, services or
products. Nothing on our sites should be construed as an offer or
solicitation to buy or sell products or securities. All investing
involves risk and possible losses. This site is currently
compensated for news publication and distribution, social media and
marketing, content creation and more. Disclosure is posted for each
compensated news release, content published /created if required but
otherwise the news was not compensated for and was published for the
sole interest of our readers and followers. Contact management and
IR of each company directly regarding specific questions. More
disclaimer info: More
disclaimer
and
disclosure
info
https://www.investorideas.com/About/Disclaimer.asp
Global investors must adhere to regulations of each country. Please
read Investorideas.com privacy policy:
https://www.investorideas.com/About/Private_Policy.asp

Learn more about our news, PR and social media, podcast and
ticker tag services at Investorideas.com for crypto stocks

https://www.investorideas.com/Investors/Services.asp

Learn more about digital advertising and guest posts for
cryptocurrency

https://www.investorideas.com/Advertise/

https://www.investorideas.com/Resources/Newsletter.asp

Contact Investorideas.com

800 665 0411