- The Trump administration says that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) funding mechanism can no longer draw money from the Federal Reserve.
- The CFPB expects to exhaust its remaining funds by early 2026, which could effectively shutter the agency unless Congress steps in.
- The move continues a years-long effort by conservatives to dismantle the agency created after the 2008 financial crisis to protect consumers from predatory lending.
The Trump administration has escalated its campaign to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – setting in motion what could be its effective closure within a year.
In a court filing (PDF File) this week, the administration said the CFPB cannot seek additional money from the Federal Reserve – its usual source of operating funds. The bureau said it has enough reserves to continue through December but “anticipates exhausting its currently available funds in early 2026.” Without congressional action, that timeline would mark the end of the CFPB’s ability to function.
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued the legal opinion underpinning the decision. The OLC argued that under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB can only receive funds from the “combined earnings of the Federal Reserve System.” Because the Fed has posted losses since 2022 (about $77.6 billion last year) the administration contends there are no “earnings” to transfer.
“The Federal Reserve currently lacks combined earnings from which the CFPB can draw,” the opinion stated. If the Federal Reserve has no profits, it cannot transfer money to the CFPB.
That interpretation redefines “combined earnings” to mean net profits rather than total income, a reading that may be up to interpretation. The Supreme Court upheld the CFPB’s funding structure as constitutional in 2024, without adopting that definition.
What happens next is yet to be seen.
An Ongoing Campaign To Weaken The CFPB
The latest move extends a years-long Republican effort to dismantle the CFPB, which was established in 2010 as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law following the 2008 crisis. The agency was designed to be insulated from congressional appropriations so it could regulate banks, credit card companies, and lenders without political interference.
There has been a driving force to shut down the CPFB.
In April, the Trump Administration pushed to layoff 90% of the CFPB staff. A Federal judge quickly blocked that order.
During negotiations for the One Big Beautiful Bill, the House sought to cut funding for the CFPB, but that was blocked in the Senate.
Legal Impact
The Justice Department’s interpretation introduces new uncertainty for both the agency and the financial industry.
The argument could have far-reaching consequences. If “combined earnings” must mean profit, the same logic could apply to other statutory transfers the Federal Reserve makes, potentially undermining the central bank’s own operations.
No doubt the specific move is an attempt to cripple the CFPB after the Supreme Court closed off other constitutional challenges. But it could have a larger impact.
The administration’s position also puts it at odds with some conservative officials. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, has previously rejected the idea that the CFPB can only be funded through Fed profits, calling the argument inconsistent with the text of Dodd-Frank.
Consumer Impact And The Future Of Financial Oversight
If the CFPB runs out of money, the effects would ripple across consumer finance. The agency oversees federal laws governing credit cards, mortgages, payday loans, and student loans – markets totaling roughly $18 trillion in consumer debt. It also handles hundreds of thousands of complaints each year from borrowers and consumers alleging deceptive or abusive practices.
Consumer advocates warn that closing the CFPB would leave a major gap in enforcement just as household debt levels and loan delinquencies are rising. Credit card, auto, and student loan delinquencies are all near or above post-recession highs. Without the bureau’s oversight, they argue, lenders could face fewer consequences for predatory behavior or data privacy violations.
For now, the CFPB remains operational but largely inactive. Much of its enforcement work has slowed, and pending legal cases may be in jeopardy if courts determine the agency lacks valid funding authority.
Congress could, in theory, appropriate funds directly to the CFPB to keep it running. But given longstanding Republican opposition, such a move is considered unlikely.
That means the agency’s future likely rests on how the courts interpret the OLC opinion and whether they view the administration’s new reading of “combined earnings” as legally defensible.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
